A Literary Trick So Smooth, Even Ghosts Got Good Reviews
There once was a man who believed you could have philosophical conversations with albatrosses, write poems about ancient mariners, and still be taken seriously by 19th-century readers in top hats. His name? Samuel Taylor Coleridge.
And he had a problem.
Not with laudanum (well, also that), but with readers who insisted that poetry must obey reality. Coleridge’s response? “Reality is boring, darling. Let me tell you a tale of hypnotic eyes and ghost ships, and you—yes, you—just believe it for the sake of art.”
Thus was born one of literature’s most scandalously brilliant concepts:
Willing Suspension of Disbelief—the literary equivalent of choosing to believe in unicorns just long enough to enjoy the ride.
And oh, it wasn’t just a throwaway idea. It was stitched into the Biographia Literaria, whispered in the smoky alleys of Romanticism, and later worshipped by fantasy writers, filmmakers, and Netflix screenwriters who dared to make you care deeply about vampires with PhDs.
Part I: “Please Pretend This Makes Sense” — The Birth of Disbelief Suspension
(Where unicorns roam freely and poets politely ask you not to fact-check them.)
Let’s set the stage.
It’s the late 1700s. Reason is having a moment. The Enlightenment has practically put imagination on trial, and the Age of Facts is marching in with powdered wigs, telescopes, and very little patience for poetry that dares to glow in the dark.
And then along came the Romantics.
A ragtag band of poetic rebels with wild hair and wilder metaphors, they wanted to write about nature, spirits, dreams, ghosts, childhood, solitude, volcanoes, Greek myths, and whatever else wandered into their minds after a long walk in the rain.
But there was a problem. Their readers—overfed on realism and under-imagined by centuries of classical restraint—started fidgeting when poems featured talking birds, glowing eyes, or women who turned into stars. “Excuse me,” said the 18th-century reader, monocle shaking. “This isn’t realistic.”
And so, enter Samuel Taylor Coleridge, riding a philosophical fog bank and muttering to himself about Imagination, Kant, and how annoying Wordsworth could be when he got too literal.
Coleridge didn’t just write poems—he theorized about why we should read them as if they mattered, even when they clearly made no earthly sense.
He came up with a delicious little trick that would let readers enjoy the impossible without throwing a logic tantrum. He called it:
“Willing Suspension of Disbelief.”
Translation: “Dear Reader, I know this story is a magical mess, but can you please turn off your common sense and let the poem wash over you like a weird but oddly moving hallucination?”
But this wasn’t just poetic bribery—it had philosophical teeth. Coleridge argued that art didn’t have to be “true” in the empirical, Newtonian, apple-falling-from-tree sense. It had to be emotionally convincing, internally coherent, and imaginatively profound. In other words, if you’re crying over a dead mariner and his haunted bird, the poem has done its job—even if no actual ghost ship ever docked at Portsmouth.
Coleridge saw the imagination as a moral faculty—not a playground, but a cathedral. And to enter it, the reader had to agree—just for a while—not to ask, “But did this really happen?”
He was also trying to clean up the mess of poetry that had lost its emotional punch. Too much “fancy,” he warned—shallow decoration, empty ornament. He wanted imagination—deep, transformative, truth-bearing illusion. It wasn’t lying. It was a higher truth disguised in verse.
So, when he and Wordsworth cooked up Lyrical Ballads in 1798 (the literary equivalent of dropping a psychedelic mixtape in the middle of the Enlightenment), they divided responsibilities: Wordsworth would write about ordinary life made extraordinary; Coleridge would write about extraordinary things made believable.
Hence: ghost sailors, shimmering water-snakes, spirits talking through breezes, and oh yes—a bird who becomes the moral conscience of the entire voyage.
But wait! Here’s the genius part.
Coleridge never said you had to believe it was real. Just that you had to agree to believe it for the length of the poem. Think of it as renting belief. You don’t buy it. You just borrow it long enough to weep over a doomed sailor cursed by bird-related karma.
Part II: “Coleridge, Biographia, and the Problem of Believability”
(In which Coleridge intellectualizes your make-believe and turns imagination into high art.)
By the time Coleridge sat down to write Biographia Literaria in 1817, he had several things going on: a crumbling friendship with Wordsworth, a crumbling marriage, a crumbling health due to a not-so-medicinal relationship with opium—and yet, in the middle of all this… he decided to write literary theory.
Because nothing screams “coping mechanism” like a 300-page philosophical memoir that casually rewrites Western aesthetics.
Now let’s be clear: Biographia Literaria is not for the faint of patience. It begins like an autobiography, takes a sharp philosophical left turn into German transcendentalism (hello Kant, Schelling, and other names you’d love to drop but fear pronouncing), and somewhere along the way, invents the psychological foundation for modern poetic criticism.
And buried inside that beautifully chaotic mess is our golden phrase:
“That willing suspension of disbelief which constitutes poetic faith.”
(Line appears in Chapter 14. Mark it. Worship it. Maybe tattoo it.)
Let’s break it down.
Coleridge was explaining his contribution to Lyrical Ballads. He admitted that his poems would deal with “persons and characters supernatural, or at least romantic.” In other words—don’t expect your neighborhood farmer here. Expect glowing-eyed sailors, demons on the mast, and whispering winds with agency.
But to make that work, he knew he had to earn the reader’s trust.
So he didn’t just write ghost stories. He layered them with human emotion, moral depth, and psychological plausibility. You might not believe in ghosts, but you do believe in guilt, isolation, wonder, and redemption. And that’s where poetic faith comes in.
“It was agreed,” Coleridge wrote, “that my endeavours should be directed to persons and characters supernatural… so as to transfer from our inward nature a human interest and a semblance of truth.”
In other words: I’ll make this ghost feel like your uncle with unresolved trauma, and you won’t even question why he’s glowing.
This is where Coleridge’s two favorite concepts show up to the literary ball:
Fancy – the literary equivalent of glitter glue. Decorative, superficial, good for party tricks but not profound.
Imagination – ah, now this was divine. The shaping spirit, the creative force that could synthesize the external world with the poet’s internal universe. Imagination wasn’t escapism—it was revelation.
So, when Coleridge asked you to suspend disbelief, he wasn’t asking for blind obedience to fantasy. He was inviting you to participate in a moral compact between the poem and the soul. A delicate truce where reason bows to beauty for a little while.
Coleridge’s imagination was almost religious in tone. He saw the poet as a kind of semi-divine being—someone who could see truth in what didn’t literally exist. As he put it:
“The primary imagination I hold to be the living power and prime agent of all human perception.”
Translation: You think you’re seeing reality? That’s already imagination at work. So why not just admit poetry is in on the same trick?
Thus, willing suspension of disbelief wasn’t just for fantasy or ghost tales. It became a theoretical framework for all literature that asked us to feel what wasn’t strictly factual. It gave birth to a modern way of reading, where emotional authenticity trumped documentary accuracy.
Today, we use this phrase casually—“You need a willing suspension of disbelief to watch this superhero movie”—but in Coleridge’s hands, it was sacred. It meant believing in truth through art, not because the world matched, but because the soul recognized something deeper.
Part III: “From Ancient Mariners to Multiverse Messiahs” — Why We’re Still Believing the Unbelievable
(In which Coleridge becomes the godfather of Marvel, Hogwarts, and every cinematic explosion that begins with “Once upon a glitch.”)
So, you thought willing suspension of disbelief was just a quaint Romantic idea, did you? A poetic relic, perhaps, best left to dusty mariners and moonlit sonnets?
Oh, sweet summer reader.
Coleridge didn’t just give us a tool for appreciating ghost ships—he accidentally handed humanity the entire survival kit for fiction in the post-truth, CGI-drenched, dopamine-driven modern age.
Let’s take a moment to trace the elegant catastrophe.
🧙♂️ From Mariner to Middle-earth
When Coleridge asked readers to accept ghost sailors and guilt-tripping albatrosses, he didn’t know he was opening the floodgates to hobbits, elves, talking trees, and dark lords with jewelry issues. But that’s exactly what happened.
Tolkien, Lewis, Le Guin, and every fantasy novelist with a sword fetish owe him poetic rent. The entire fantasy genre is built on the sacred principle: Please believe in this world long enough to cry when it breaks. Dragons make sense, provided the dialogue is emotionally sincere and the map at the front of the book is intimidatingly detailed.
🦸♂️ From Ghosts to Gamma Rays
Fast forward to the 21st century, and you’ve got grown adults weeping over flying men in capes, time-traveling sorcerers, and raccoons with machine guns. Every Marvel movie opens with the same silent plea Coleridge once made over a glass of laudanum:
“This might look ridiculous, but trust us—if you suspend disbelief, we promise feelings.”
Superheroes are the new epic heroes. They’re tragic, flawed, melodramatic, and deeply allergic to staying dead. Audiences know it’s make-believe—but they choose to believe, because underneath the green screens and vibranium is a mythic truth: we want heroes who bleed, heal, and wear their capes like bandages.
The moment you watched Iron Man die and sniffled into your popcorn, Coleridge won. Again.
📚 From Realism to Magic Realism
And then there’s Magical Realism—a genre that takes Coleridge’s idea and says: “Let’s not even warn the reader. Let’s just drop a ghost in the middle of dinner and see if anyone flinches.”
Gabriel García Márquez, Salman Rushdie, Isabel Allende—they all write like Coleridge never died, just evolved into a Latin American literary uncle with a flair for poetic surrealism. Here, reality doesn’t need to be paused—it’s already woven with myth. The supernatural isn’t suspended—it’s baked in.
And the reader? Complicit. Enthralled. Grateful.
🎬 From Page to Pixel: Cinema and the Deal with the Devil
Hollywood, ever the opportunist, took Coleridge’s sacred pact and laminated it in IMAX. Films don’t whisper “suspend disbelief.” They blast it into your retinas at 120 frames per second.
A man gets bitten by a radioactive spider? Fine. A child attends a wizarding school and no one asks about safety regulations? Sure. Dinosaurs are back from extinction, again, and still no one builds better fences? Why not.
Because cinema doesn’t need logic—it needs emotional fidelity. Coleridge knew this: make the audience feel, and they’ll forgive anything. Plot holes, talking apes, Matrix code, time loops, zombie romance—if the human core beats loud enough, disbelief will lie down like a loyal dog and play dead.
🧠 The Streaming Age of Infinite Suspension
In the age of binge-watching, Coleridge’s idea has mutated into something both sacred and absurd. We now suspend disbelief by the season. We willingly believe that people never recharge their phones, survive fatal injuries with witty one-liners, and fall in love with ghosts, robots, and occasionally their own clones.
And let’s not even begin with multiverses. That’s just Coleridge on psychedelics.
“What if every possible version of disbelief could be suspended at once?”
— Netflix, probably.
🤯 Why We Still Need It
Because, let’s face it: reality has become uncomfortably believable. The news cycle feels like satire, algorithms write poems, and billionaires launch themselves into space while quoting Shakespeare badly. We need art that lets us step sideways into the improbable—because truth has become too surreal to trust on its own.
Willing suspension of disbelief isn’t escapism—it’s survival. It’s the quiet agreement that, for a little while, we’ll let go of the rational to embrace the meaningful. The dragon might not be real, but the courage is. The ghost ship might be fiction, but the guilt? Oh, that’s yours.
Coleridge didn’t just give literature a phrase. He gave it permission.
To soar.
To sing.
To be beautifully, gloriously, unapologetically unreal.
ABS folds the scroll with a theatrical bow—pausing just long enough to make the dragons look plausible and the ghosts feel seen.
Because sometimes, belief isn’t about logic—it’s about longing.
About choosing beauty over proof, poetry over paperwork, and emotional truth over factual boredom.
So go ahead, suspend your disbelief. The story’s better when you do.
Signed,
ABS
The Literary Scholar
Champion of Thoughtful Nonsense and Mythical Accuracy
Share this post / Spread the witty word / Let the echo wander / Bookmark the brilliance